Deposit Appraisal & Collection Policy: Difference between revisions

From ADA Public Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= Collection development policy=
==Submission appraisal criteria==
The ADA accepts data that fits broadly into the remit of the archive and can be described with the social science DDI metadata. Submissions must be of current value or of potential historical interest to the ADA. The subject matter being in either the Social, Political or Economic areas, and their many affiliated research fields. The ADA encourages submission of full project data and not just the data associated with a publication release, which is often only a small subset of the actual data available. Submissions must have the potential for secondary analysis using the digital data files and their supporting material. At least a portion of the submissions needs to be made publicly accessible. However, tightly controlled access conditions may apply even to that portion. 


The ADA collection policy aims to provide researchers with general guidance around the types of data that the ADA will accept for curation, preservation and subsequent dissemination. Research material submitted to the ADA should support the Archive's mission and scope and meet the needs of the user community.
==Out of scope materials==
The ADA will only accept digital material. There are no other firm rules regarding the material that won’t be accepted by the ADA for preservation and dissemination, however submissions that contain explicit or offensive material and those that offer limited potential for secondary analysis will not be considered favorably. In addition, submissions that pose significant risk of re-identification may also be rejected where the depositor (and/or the data rights-holder) is unwilling to apply appropriate data or other protections as recommended by ADA staff. Materials submitted may also not be accepted if the metadata provided is insufficient for long-term preservation. This includes the social science DDI metadata on ADA Dataverse, as well as variable-level metadata for all files submitted and all data variables. The ADA will work with depositors to ensure metadata is complete at all levels. Finally, in the event that the ADA determines that the material is not suitable for archiving, it will endeavour to provide the depositor with suggestions of other suitable repositories. The final decision about acceptance of a submission lies with the ADA Director.


https://docs.ada.edu.au/index.php/Mission_%26_Scope
==Preferred data formats==
The ADA accepts most formats. However, for tabular data files, the ADA prefers submission in SPSS format (.sav files). This format captures variable level metadata (variable and value labels, data formats etc.) and SPSS Statistics is adept at exporting multiple alternative file formats. The ADA also accepts Stata (.dta) SAS (.sas; .sas7bdat), and R (.rdata), as well as text formats (.csv; .tab) provided data including both value labels and codes can be provided. Other data formats will be considered on a case-by-case basis. For qualitative data, data formats vary significantly and submitted formats will also be considered on a case-by-case basis.  


See the deposit quick guide for steps involved in lodging data with the ADA. This guide will help to ensure that data and metadata are sufficient for long-term preservation and for dissemination. 
==References ==
 
[22] Deposit Appraisal & Collection Policy – (https://docs.ada.edu.au/index.php/Deposit_Appraisal_%26_Collection_Policy)
https://docs.ada.edu.au/index.php/Quick_Deposit_Guide
 
= Submission appraisal criteria =
Research materials submitted to the ADA that meet the following criteria will be prioritised for acceptance in the ADA collection.
 
Remit of the ADA: The ADA accepts materials that fit broadly into the remit of the archive.
 
Social science DDI metadata: Materials should be able to be described with social science DDI metadata. Adherence to this metadata scheme will be assessed via the completeness of the avaiable metadata fields on ADA Dataverse.
 
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13HP-jI_cwLDHBetn9UKTREPJ_F4iHdAvhjmlvmYdSSw/edit?gid=0#gid=0
 
Scientific or historic value: Materials must be of current value or potential historical interest to the ADA.
 
Subject matter: The subject matter of submitted materials should be in either the Social, Political or Economic areas, and affiliated research fields.
 
Complete data: Where possible, full project data is preferred, not just the data associated with a publication release or any other subset of the data available.
 
Secondary analysis: Materials must have the potential for secondary analysis using the data and supporting documentation. All materials must be made publicly available with transparent access criteria.
 
= Out of scope materials =
 
Digital materials: The ADA will only accept digital materials.
 
Insufficient metadata:  Materials submitted may not be accepted if the metadata provided is insufficient for long-term preservation. This includes the social science DDI metadata on ADA Dataverse, as well as names and labels for all files submitted and all data variables. The ADA will work with depositors to ensure metadata is complete at all levels. 
 
Explicit or offensive content: Materials that contain explicit or offensive material.
 
Limited secondary use potential: Materials that offer limited or no potential for secondary analysis will not be considered favorably. 
 
Disclosure risk: Materials that pose significant risk of re-identification that cannot be sufficiently addressed.
 
In the event that the ADA determines that the material is not suitable for archiving, it will endeavour to provide the Data Owner with other potential archives that are more suited to the subject matter. The final decision about acceptance of a submission lies with the director or deputy director of the ADA.
 
= Preferred data formats =
 
The ADA accepts most formats, has a list of preferred formats. All data and documents will be saved in the AIP in a preservation format (see R09 Preservation plan) regardless of the format received in the SIP. For dissemination, the ADA will create SPSS, STATA, SAS and CSV versions for quantitative data.  For qualitative data, possible data formats vary significantly. For this reason, ADA has developed specific preferred formats, partly based on those identified by the UK Data Archive .

Latest revision as of 02:23, 14 September 2024

Submission appraisal criteria

The ADA accepts data that fits broadly into the remit of the archive and can be described with the social science DDI metadata. Submissions must be of current value or of potential historical interest to the ADA. The subject matter being in either the Social, Political or Economic areas, and their many affiliated research fields. The ADA encourages submission of full project data and not just the data associated with a publication release, which is often only a small subset of the actual data available. Submissions must have the potential for secondary analysis using the digital data files and their supporting material. At least a portion of the submissions needs to be made publicly accessible. However, tightly controlled access conditions may apply even to that portion.

Out of scope materials

The ADA will only accept digital material. There are no other firm rules regarding the material that won’t be accepted by the ADA for preservation and dissemination, however submissions that contain explicit or offensive material and those that offer limited potential for secondary analysis will not be considered favorably. In addition, submissions that pose significant risk of re-identification may also be rejected where the depositor (and/or the data rights-holder) is unwilling to apply appropriate data or other protections as recommended by ADA staff. Materials submitted may also not be accepted if the metadata provided is insufficient for long-term preservation. This includes the social science DDI metadata on ADA Dataverse, as well as variable-level metadata for all files submitted and all data variables. The ADA will work with depositors to ensure metadata is complete at all levels. Finally, in the event that the ADA determines that the material is not suitable for archiving, it will endeavour to provide the depositor with suggestions of other suitable repositories. The final decision about acceptance of a submission lies with the ADA Director.

Preferred data formats

The ADA accepts most formats. However, for tabular data files, the ADA prefers submission in SPSS format (.sav files). This format captures variable level metadata (variable and value labels, data formats etc.) and SPSS Statistics is adept at exporting multiple alternative file formats. The ADA also accepts Stata (.dta) SAS (.sas; .sas7bdat), and R (.rdata), as well as text formats (.csv; .tab) provided data including both value labels and codes can be provided. Other data formats will be considered on a case-by-case basis. For qualitative data, data formats vary significantly and submitted formats will also be considered on a case-by-case basis.

References

[22] Deposit Appraisal & Collection Policy – (https://docs.ada.edu.au/index.php/Deposit_Appraisal_%26_Collection_Policy)